Main Ads

Ad

The Rise of AI Brings New Challenges to Evidence in Court

5 hours ago | Artificial Intelligence


Jakarta, INTI - The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is creating new challenges for judicial proceedings, as the technology can now generate videos, images, and audio that closely resemble real events. This makes the authentication of digital evidence increasingly important.

Deputy Minister of Communication and Digital Affairs Nezar Patria raised the issue during the National Law Forum in Central Jakarta on Monday, August 24, 2026.

According to Nezar, generative AI is now capable of creating synthetic realities in various formats that could potentially be presented as evidence in legal proceedings.

“This becomes significant when we consider that evidence submitted in court can include recordings, videos, and photographs,” he said.

AI Poses New Challenges for Evidence Authentication

Nezar noted that AI’s ability to produce highly realistic videos, images, and audio presents a challenge for the authentication of evidence in court.

“This is an important test. How can such evidence convince the judges? How can the court properly authenticate the evidence submitted during proceedings?” he said.

The situation highlights the need for legal professionals to strengthen their understanding of digital technology and the latest developments in AI.

At the same time, AI can also be leveraged to support the legal system by helping organize judicial documents, conduct legal analysis, and improve legal services for the public.

“For example, the Supreme Court has adopted artificial intelligence technology in the form of a smart panel to process the administration of incoming cases, which can number in the tens of thousands,” Nezar said.

AI Supports the Process, but Judges Make the Decisions

Nezar emphasized that the use of AI in judicial proceedings is intended to support human work, rather than replace judges in making decisions.

“The decision remains with the judge, not AI. It is still humans, not AI, who make the decisions. AI only provides assistance,” he said.

Therefore, while AI can enhance administrative processes and support legal analysis, the authority to make judicial decisions ultimately remains with humans.

Conclusion

AI is transforming the legal sector while introducing new challenges in authenticating digital evidence. As synthetic media becomes increasingly realistic, stronger digital literacy and verification mechanisms are essential. AI can support legal administration and analysis, but judicial decisions must ultimately remain in human hands.

Read more: BRIN Promotes Use of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things to Strengthen Smart Farming

Indonesia Technology & Innovation
Advertisement 1